I don't understand the logic. The team fails, on the whole, and though the "magic figure" (and I use that term loosely) of 400 was reached, there was a "for 10" that succeeded it which goes sort of unnoticed by a lot. Again, the scapegoat is Virat Kohli, and though he didnt perform at all in the match as required, save a finger to God-knows-who in the crowd, I think even Gambhir didn't play well. At the end of the third day's play, there was not a run scored from the bat for nearly 9 or 10 overs. People were wondering what was going on, why they're not scoring... the best part of those ten overs was that a top-form pace battery of the Aussies were denied a wicket. If the same thing continued for the next day too, even if the world record for least runs in a test-match day was to be taken by India, the test match could have been saved right? Dravid and VVS did bat a whole day without giving their wickets in Indian conditions, even the remotest possibility should have been taken into consideration....
I dont like this pace battery of ours too now, when it comes to that. I say axe Ishant, get in Irfan Pathan. Aussie conditions are helping swing, and I do believe Irfan Pathan was one of the best swing exponents in the pace battery earlier.. I'd say Pravin, but he's not fully fit and I dont like to see him get further injured. Irfan would give a batting option too, and Ashwin can be the lone spinner again. With batting, I think both Gambhir and Kohli should be axed. A fifty does not say I'm back in form, dont ignore me. The way he was batting on start of 2nd innings, I thought that India was determined to make it a three day test and take a two day picnic at the Opera House. I think it needs to be put as a message that Indian team comes first and no player is an automatic selection.
Team: Rahane, Sehwag, Dravid, Tendulkar, VVS Laxman, MS Dhoni, Rohit Sharma, Ashwin, Zaheer, Yadav, (Irfan or Sreesanth or Pravin if fit or Vinay Kumar)