I shall do what is most convenient and efficient for me, as do you.
But why are you using a non sequitur as part of your argument? Or, are you saying that no one watches films in cinema halls because they can watch a pirated DVD, that no one buys CDs and music from the Internet because they can buy pirated copies, and that no one buys computer software because they can get pirated copies--is Microsoft about to go bankrupt?
Also, you dd not justify your argument by stating to what cost you will continue to read published, printed books. As the decades go by and more and more people read original works via Kindle, pdf, online and others, there will be fewer printed books. Even now, Encyclopaedia Britannica and Oxford English Dictionary are available only online. As more and more publishers become reluctant to print books, the supply will lessen, and the costs to consumers who buy those books will go up. How much are you willing to pay for a book?
Finally, why are you arguing against your own best interests? It is difficult for me to define your blog in one word, but I think that "stories" would be apt--either in the form of fiction, or in the idea of trying to get a point across. Are you saying that your readers ought to get such stories from printed books rather than from your blog?