Why Indivine makes me quit Indiblogger

I think it is a good suggestion. 

I "upvote" the "Downvote" option

A timeframe does make sense. Many other forums have a 8-36 hour time window after a story is posted. 8-10 hours makes sense for posts where its typically a news post but for creative ones a 36-48hour time window makes more sense.

Indiblogger has a mix of both and if I am right we have 80%+ creative ones so a time window of say 24-36 hours for a post would make sense and chance for every post to get visibility.

@ Tavish - If you promote a post from a blogger who is ranked lower than you (Indirank), it gets counted as 2 votes for that person. If the person is ranked better (and equal I guess), he/she gets 1 vote for that vote casted by you.

I, too, support the rating system... Even I think the class of Indivine is not being maintained. Random blogs with virtually no 'top-quality' content are getting good number of votes. :)

From the FAQ's:

I voted once, but the count increased by 2 points. Is that a bug? No, that's a feature of IndiVine. The IndiVine voting system is integrated with IndiRank, where a vote for a higher ranking blog gets more weightage. Let's take for example the blog gujiligalaba.blogspot.com having an IndiRank of 55. Every vote for posts from this blog will have a value of (1 + .55 = 1.55). Votes are rounded off for display. All fresh entries on IndiVine start at 0 votes, regardless of the IndiRank.

Yes Gayathrie, this is precisely I had suggested Rating system instead of Thumbs down, becoz v may not want to give Thumbs Down. Rating is always relative and positive.

hey i never thought of that... I guess there are evil people here too! lol

@Magali

Cartelization cannot be too large. At max it may be around 10-15 people who may vote for each other and vote down others posts. I dont see it growing beyond that.

At present 10-15 votes is enuff to make your post amongst the top post in Indivine. Now there 100-200 people (perhaps even more) visiting Indivine. At present they can't vote down a post if it is not good. All they can do is to vote up a post. It is difficult for all of them to agree to vote at one post only. Their vote gets divided.

By giving them right to vote down a post, essentially this anomoly can be removed. Even if one pulls down a particular post, there others who can always pull it up. Ofcourse, even this system is not 100% and people can get away with this too. The point is "There are some bull**** blogs which are rated much higherand thats what makes me sad"

I always thought that Indivine was a great place to promote your blog and discover new and interesting blogs. i follow moree than 30-40 blogs regularly. But this is not the case.

In any case, limiting the time for a post on Indivine is neccessary. I have so far resisted promoting my own blog. But here is a live example:

Just go to the Sports category in Indivine and you would find a post dated April 10th Is Cricket Killing Other Sports in India? Part I  and then there is my post Why is billion strong India a laggard in Sports  . A six month old post that is no where in quality as compared to mine is rated higher than a post that I wrote just 2-3 days ago. If any one of doubt my claim, you are free to read both the posts to decide for yourself.

By no means did I mean to criticize the writer of the earlier post. I just wish to draw attention to the fact that the system is deeply flawed. And moreover this particular post of mine was voted as among the best on Instablogs. In the past too, a couple of my posts have been among the best on other blogging forums but not here. It clearly shows that there is something wrong here.

Blogging is my passion and I usually spend around 2-3 weeks to collect data for any post.

I see what you mean. But I would still be apprehensive if this feature was implemented.

About your sports post, I am by no means a person to judge that, because I don't follow any sport! But that earlier post has been on Indivine a long time. So it's rated higher. Maybe if you wait a little you post will overtake that one.

@Renie

Since u acknowledged that there is a problem, i am sure u will fix it as well. Here a few suggestions as when u implement the rating system (i hope sooner rather than later)

• Rating system would be far more complicated than the present thumbs up feature. There are two important factors that need to be considered - the actual rating ( an average of all user ratings) and the number of votes. A blog with a rating 3.5 after 10 votes is certainly better than a blog with just 2 votes with a rating of 4. Indirank may also be given some weightage although I am not convinced that it should be used.
• Freshness needs to be given more weightage. At the sametime there can be other ways to more exposure to top rated posts. For instance, u could have a new feature Indi Archive having say top 50 posts from each month. The exact number can be worked out by you based on number of posts you get every month. This would give more exposure better quality bloggers.
• The Indiblogger homepage presently shows the users who are more active on Indiblogger forums. You could also show the users whose posts have been selected amongst the best in the previous month.
• Lastly, I don't think cartelization can be completely removed. I am sure u can easily locate who are people indulging in this if you dig deep in data as to who voted for whom. But that is ofcourse timeconsuming.
• One thing that you can do is show who all voted for a particular post. May be not showing the exact rating but just showing the usernames. Let the Indiblogger users find out if at all there is a cartel.

I would be waiting for such a feature. Others may add in.