The very response you garnered to this topic proves your point...
I had already made this point in my blog review topic too...
http://www.indiblogger.in/forum/topic.php?id=4717
It had achieved a thunderous response of exactly one blogger posting on it... And politically and correctly, disagreeing with me.
Our society's hypocritical. But it has always been that way. I bet no 'review my blog' petitions by girl bloggers go unanswered (that too with positive reviews). No matter how bad they are.
I've said this before and I'll say it again: It's not that girls make bad bloggers/ writers, it's just that even the crappiest blogs can get away by putting a youngish, fairish. schoolgirlish picture of themselves and it'll still have comments resonating "Awsumm bloggg" and "Wow, it is da best blog I ever read..." by male readers, nay, thrill-seekers.
But this is has been put forth quite boldly here. So I'll move on.
This topic brings us to another question; a rhetorical one at one at that... :P
Are men funnier than women?
The answer isn't 'yes'.
It's DUH.
Mostly, because humour isn't a talent or a skill... It's a self-defence mechanism. Jocks are usually not funny, it's usually the non-athletic kinds. Alpha males usually don't need to be funny. That goes with those who are good at sports on one side and surprisingly, (considering the Indian context) those who top the class. The primary reason being they don't really NEED to hunt for a mate.
Humour is also a social aphrodisiac. It's a means to find a partner of your IQ and thus, a means of propogation of species...
Prosecuted races are usually funnier than alpha-races. Example: Jewish people, as an ethnicity, have a high propensity for humour.
And (most) women, frankly, don't need to 'woo' a partner. Thanks to male testosterone levels, men are only a step behind, possibly stalking them.
Women need a doggie-whistle. Not a sense of humour.
Amen.