PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, 1955: CASES

Top Post on IndiBlogger
6

Section 3State of M.P. v. Puranchand, Madhya Pradesh High Court held for the purpose of section 3, the person prevented must either be professing the same religion as other persons to whom the place is open.The object of Section 3 is not to create any new rights in favour of untouchables but it is intended only to put them at par with other caste Hindus.Parameswaran Moorthy v. Vasudeo Kurup, the Kerala High Court held that Section 3 does not confer unfettered and absolute rig...

Read this post on lexengineglobe.blogspot.com


ANOOP YADAV

blogs from Lucknow